Technology

US Officials Accused of Hiding Secret Surveillance Court Ruling

US Officials Accused of Hiding Secret Surveillance Court Ruling
Table of Contents
  1. Secret Court Objections and Delayed Release
  2. Lapsed Authority and Congressional Demands
  3. Civil Liberties Groups Oppose Renewal

Two Democratic lawmakers with extensive oversight experience over American intelligence accuse the Trump administration of unlawfully withholding a confidential judicial ruling from Congress. The senators state the administration is delaying the release until lawmakers reauthorize a controversial surveillance authority.

Secret Court Objections and Delayed Release

Seven months ago, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court raised objections regarding search filters that enabled intelligence analysts to extract messages belonging to Americans from intercepted data. These searches occurred without the mandated approvals, written justifications, or required records. Despite these concerns, the court authorized an additional year of surveillance.

As reported by Ars Technica, the judicial ruling remains classified. Senators Ron Wyden of Oregon and Adam Schiff of California point out that the administration missed its own September deadline to make the document public.

Lapsed Authority and Congressional Demands

Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act expired in June after congressional inaction on its renewal, although data collection persists pursuant to the court’s authorization in March. Official government guidelines dictate that such rulings undergo public release reviews within 180 days. That timeframe ended on September 13, coinciding with intelligence officials lobbying lawmakers for reauthorization before the year concludes.

Wyden, the senior member of the Senate Intelligence Committee, and Schiff, the former leader of the House intelligence panel, issued a November 6 deadline for the administration to justify the delay and identify the officials accountable.

“If this administration won’t follow this simple statutory directive,” the senators stated in a letter sent to Director of National Intelligence Jay Clayton and Attorney General Todd Blanche, as obtained exclusively by WIRED, “it is unclear why Congress or the American people should trust this administration to follow any of the other legal limits to Section 702.”

Civil Liberties Groups Oppose Renewal

In parallel, Demand Progress joined 22 other government accountability and civil liberties organizations in urging congressional leaders to block the reauthorization of Section 702. The coalition argues that Congress should withhold renewal while the administration conceals legally required disclosures about the operation of the surveillance initiative.

The organizations signing the petition include the American Civil Liberties Union and the conservative Project for Privacy and Surveillance Accountability.

You May Also Like

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *