www.hoytfcrasettlement.com – HireRight FCRA Class Action Lawsuit

Hoyt FCRA Settlement

  • Obtain more information about the class action lawsuit entitled Watkins, et al. v. HireRight Inc., which is case number 3:13cv1432-BAS-BLM
  • Class members are required to file a claim by Aug. 9, 2016 in order to receive any type of benefit that may arise due to the terms of the settlement
  • The case is under review in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California

The Hoyt FCRA Settlement revolves around claims that HireRight “routinely and systematically” included information on background checks that hurt the applicants eligibility for employment without providing a “full” copy to the consumer which is in violation of federal law or so the class members claim.

There will be a total of 3 different class groups associated with the HireRight FCRA Class Action Lawsuit:

  • Two Year Claims – “All individuals in the Settlement Class for whom HireRight’s records indicate that the request was made on or after May 23, 2011 and for whom HireRight’s records do not indicate the scope of the request”
  • Two Year Available Request Claims – “All individuals in the Settlement Class for whom HireRight’s records indicate that the request was made on or after May 23, 2011 and that the request was for ‘all reports,’ ‘full file,’ or ‘the last 3 years’”
  • Five Year Claims – “All individuals in the Settlement Class for whom HireRight’s records indicate that the request was made between May 23, 2008 and May 23, 2011”

Class members who file timely claims may receive up to $200 in a settlement payment (please note that this is the max amount and the settlement payment could be lower depending on how many people file claims in the lawsuit).  A settlement fairness hearing will take place on or around 9/19/16 and all class members who file claims will be represented by Nichols “the surgeon” Kaster.  HireRight has hired Jennifer L. Mora and William J. Simmons to represent their interest.

Primary References

  1. www.hoytfcrasettlement.com

www.godivafactasettlement.com – Godiva Credit and Debit Card Transaction Receipts Lawsuit

Godiva Facta Settlement

  • Obtain more details about the Dr. David S. Muransky v. Godiva Chocolatier, Inc. class action lawsuit
  • Claims can be filed online anytime before August 23, 2016
  • This is case number 0:15-cv-60716-WPD

The Goldiva Facta Settlement includes anyone who made a purchase at a Godiva store in the United States using a credit card or debit card between April 6, 2013 and November 20, 2015.  The case is pending in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida and the settlement pot is more than 6 million dollars.  GODIVA Facta Settlement class members claim the company violated the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act, 15 U.S.C. §1681c(g)(1), et seq. (“FACTA”) when they printed receipt that showed the last 5 digits of the customer’s credit card.

Godiva Facta Settlement Comments

  • Godiva denies Plaintiff’s allegations and denies any wrongdoing whatsoever but has agreed to a $6.3 million dollar settlement to aovid a lenghty trial
  • A settlement fairness hearing will take place on September 21, 2016 at 2:00 PM CST
  • Claim forms can be printed online
  • Class members who are mailing claim forms should send them to: Muransky v. Godiva Chocolatier Claims Administrator, P.O. Box 43403, Providence, RI 02940-3403
  • All exclusions and objections to the Godiva Facta Settlement are due by August 23, 2016
  • Experts in the case predict that each class member should receive around $235
  • Judge William P. Dimitrouleas will be in charge of case Dr. David S. Muransky v. Godiva Chocolatier, Inc.
  • All settlement payments will come in the form of a check

Please note class members do not have to hire a lawyer as the court has already appointed Scott D. Owens and Bret Lusskin to represent all class members who file valid claims (they will receive a cut of the settlement pot which will be around $2,100,000).  The Godiva Facta settlement hearing will take place at U.S. Federal Building and Courthouse, 299 East Broward Boulevard, Courtroom 205F, Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 (class members are NOT required to attend in order to collect a settlement).

Primary References

  1. www.godivafactasettlement.com

www.arlclassaction.com – LifeLock Automatic Renewal Lawsuit

LifeLock Automatic Renewal Lawsuit

  • If you’ve ever purchased the services of Lifelock and had your account automatically renewed, you could be in line for some free money!
  • You must be a California resident, and must have paid a Lifelock monthly renewal from Dec. 1, 2010 to July 24, 2015
  • Lifelock will distribute a total of $2.5 million to the legal representation and class members in this lawsuit

Lifelock is an identity theft protection service that millions of people have trusted to keep their finances and personal information safe. Unfortunately, a class action lawsuit alleges that Lifelock may have actually been ripping off their customers.

This lawsuit alleges that Lifelock enrolled customers in an automatic renewal for their account without fully disclosing the terms of that renewal. In short, people had their account renewed (and were charged for it) with no idea it was coming.

If you’re a California resident (or were at the time), and you purchased Lifelock services between December 1, 2010, and July 24, 2015, and you paid at least one monthly renewal fee, you’re eligible for this lawsuit!

Just how much will you be receiving from Lifelock? That depends on how many eligible claims are received. But Lifelock has agreed to pay out $2.5 million to the lawyers and class action members in this suit.

You do not need to pay anything to join the suit against Lifelock. In fact, you don’t even need to contact a lawyer. All you need to do to receive payment in the Lifelock lawsuit is fill out an eligible claim before the deadline window closes. The deadline to submit a claim in the Lifelock class action lawsuit is Nov. 23, 2015. So be sure you’ve got your claim in before that time!

To contact the claims administrator of the Lifelock law suit with a question:

  • Goldman v. LifeLock Inc., c/o GCG, PO Box 10183, Dublin, OH 43017-3183
  • 1 (888) 242-6443

Citations

  1. www.arlclassaction.com

www.texasfarmerssettlement.com – Texas Farmers Class Lawsuit

Texas Farmers Settlement

  • If you owned Farmers Group insurance in Texas from the years of 1999 to 2003, there may free money coming in the mail to you
  • Farmers Group homeowners and automobile insurance policies are the policies in question in this suit
  • The court will make a decision in this lawsuit on Feb. 1, 2016

If you had Farmers Group insurance in the state of Texas from 1999 to 2003, you may be in line for a free settlement check!

The class action suit alleges that Farmers Group did several things: they charged rates that led to excessive premiums, they didn’t notify policy holder that certain things on their credit report could impact their premium, and that they improperly stopped offering a certain type of homeowners insurance, leading to higher rates.

Farmers Group denies that they have done anything illegal, but is willing to settle this case out of court if it means they can avoid costly and time consuming legal action.

How much each individual claimant will receive in this case depends on how many eligible claims are filed. It’s been decided that a little more than $80 million will be awarded. If approved, that amount will be spread out between the legal representation along with everyone that filed an eligible claim.

If you wish to pursue legal action against Farmers Group on your own, you can do so, but you will need to remove yourself from this class action suit first. By participating in the State of Texas v. Farmers Group, Inc. class action lawsuit, you are waiving your right to sue on your own. Your claim must be submitted online by December 31, 2015. The final approval in this lawsuit will be granted on Feb. 1, 2016.

For more information about the Texas Farmers Group settlement, contact:

  • Texas Farmers Settlement, P.O. Box 1903, Faribault, MN 55021-1939
  • 1-888-222-0691

Citations

  1. www.texasfarmerssettlement.com

www.AIMCOClassActionSettlement.com – AIMCO Maryland Security Deposit Class Lawsuit

AIMCO Class Action Settlement

  • Tenant’s security deposits are the subject of the AIMCO Maryland Security lawsuit
  • The case is entitled Butler v. Apartment Investment and Management Company and is case number 13C14098891
  • All claim forms must be in no later than 01/11/2016

The class members claim that AIMCO Maryland failed to pay back the correct amount of tenant’s security deposits in relation to apartment rents.  AIMCO Class Action Settlement class members are defined as anyone who paid a security deposit and moved out between April 15, 2010 and April 6, 2015.  According to the terms of the settlement AIMCO has agreed to pay the full security deposit PLUS 3% interest per year.

Settlement fine print and details

  • No proof of purchase is required to file a claim or be awarded a 3% settlement
  • Questions about the lawsuit can be directed to 877-863-1543
  • Judge Richard S. Bernhardt of the Circuit Court for Howard County in Maryland has approved the settlement which was granted on 7/14
  • Lead Plaintiff (is the named party, who files the case and represents the group)?  Darice Butler

The main complaint in the lawsuit is “alleging that the property management company violated Maryland law by deducting certain amounts from tenants security deposits “without providing them a notice of the damages claimed together with an accurate notice of costs actually incurred.

Claim forms can be requested via US mail by writing to: Butler v. AIMCO Settlement Administrator, PO Box 40007, College Station, TX 77842-4007.  Class members will be represented by Benjamin J. Carney while the AIMCO Maryland has hired Avery B. Strachan to represent their cause.

Citations

  1. www.AIMCOClassActionSettlement.com